Champion sheet · Top

Yorick

Patches 16.20 to 16.22 · KR

Tournament presence · pick + ban

10.4%#78 of 173 champions

Pick: 3.7%picked in 659 of 17,718 games
Ban: 6.7%1,119 bans over 16,766 games, against 3.5% in soloQ

Win rate as Top51.5% between 48.2% and 54.8% over 619 gamesSoloQ 48.2%: no clear gap

Median length29.2 minsoloQ 26 min

Amateur: 18,564 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 235,635 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.DraftLength
How to play itGrasp of the Undying, then Trinity Force, Black Cleaver, and Spear of Shojin: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compTeam damage first: more damage than 89% of top laners.DamagePokeSplit-push
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftTaken at any point of the series.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

DraftPicked more often in amateur play
Amateur
1.7%
SoloQ
1.1%
1.7% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.1% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
6.5%
SoloQ
3.5%
6.5% ban rate in amateur play over 12,177 games, against 3.5% in soloQ over 158,928 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
29.2 min
SoloQ
26 min
Median of 29.2 min in amateur play, against 26 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Grasp of the Undying, then Trinity Force, Black Cleaver, and Spear of Shojin: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesGrasp of the Undying48% · 3,859

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Teleport65% · 5,229

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 91% · 102 games

Core (3 legendaries)5% · 157

5%of soloQ games

Trinity Force
Black Cleaver
Spear of Shojin

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Team damage first: more damage than 89% of top laners.

Team damagetop11%25% · top laners: 20%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

Damage
Poke
Split-push

Like other top laners

Damage in late game
Gold at 15 min
Gold at 20 min
Absorbs damage
Takes its kills in duels

What it is not

Few teamfights
Little CC

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 96 in lane, 88 in mid game and 55 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

692+93 vs 599

967+99 vs 868

1,084+5 vs 1,079

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Yoricktop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 70% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 96 of 100 among top laners692 · median 599
Damage in mid game · rank 88 of 100 among top laners967 · median 868
Damage in late game · rank 55 of 100 among top laners1,084 · median 1,079
Gold at 15 min · rank 66 of 100 among top laners+211 · median +119
Gold at 20 min · rank 70 of 100 among top laners+350 · median +100
Absorbs damage · rank 47 of 100 among top laners890 · median 970
Plays teamfights · rank 17 of 100 among top laners50% · median 53%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 71 of 100 among top laners31% · median 28%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 75 of 100 among top lanersrank 75 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 13 of 100 among top laners0.3 · median 0.8
Team damage · rank 89 of 100 among top laners25% · median 20%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

Nasus54.5% · expected 48.9% · 33 g+5.6 ptSoloQ -3.6

K'Sante59.4% · expected 54.3% · 32 g+5.1 ptSoloQ -0.8

Sion54.3% · expected 51.6% · 35 g+2.7 ptSoloQ -9.4

Junglegap to expected

Vi53.8% · expected 51.2% · 39 g+2.7 ptSoloQ -4.4

Sylas52.3% · expected 50.9% · 44 g+1.4 ptSoloQ -0.1

Midgap to expected

Sylas63.3% · expected 53.7% · 30 g+9.7 ptSoloQ +3.5

Viktor56.3% · expected 51.2% · 48 g+5.1 ptSoloQ +0.1

Ahri50.0% · expected 48.7% · 36 g+1.3 ptSoloQ +0.6

ADCgap to expected

Jhin57.7% · expected 55.8% · 52 g+1.9 ptSoloQ +0.8

Xayah50.0% · expected 49.9% · 30 g+0.1 ptSoloQ +2.7

Supportgap to expected

Leona62.5% · expected 51.6% · 40 g+10.9 ptSoloQ +2.0

With

Junglegap to expected

Vi53.3% · expected 51.9% · 45 g+1.5 ptSoloQ -2.1

Midgap to expected

Viktor53.7% · expected 51.9% · 41 g+1.8 ptSoloQ -2.8

ADCgap to expected

Ezreal57.7% · expected 47.3% · 52 g+10.4 ptSoloQ +1.2

Caitlyn62.3% · expected 53.8% · 61 g+8.5 ptSoloQ -0.7

Jhin53.1% · expected 47.3% · 49 g+5.8 ptSoloQ +1.7

Lucian54.1% · expected 50.4% · 37 g+3.7 ptSoloQ +2.5

Xayah56.1% · expected 53.1% · 41 g+3.0 ptSoloQ +0.2

Supportgap to expected

Thresh61.5% · expected 53.1% · 52 g+8.5 ptSoloQ -3.4

Leona59.1% · expected 51.5% · 44 g+7.6 ptSoloQ +4.4

Blitzcrank56.7% · expected 52.9% · 30 g+3.8 ptSoloQ +2.0

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top17 champions