Tournament presence · pick + ban
6.8%#99 of 173 champions
Pick
2.5%picked in 196 of 7,904 games
Ban
4.3%158 bans over 3,675 games, against 4.2% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid40.6% between 33.9% and 47.6% over 138 gamesSoloQ 50.6%: clear gap
Median length29.6 minsoloQ 27.7 min

Amateur: 7,832 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 268,631 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • Win rateWins less in amateur play
    Amateur
    40.6%
    SoloQ
    50.6%
    40.6% win rate in amateur play over 138 games, against 50.6% in soloQ over 24,621 games.
  • DraftPicked less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    1.0%
    SoloQ
    3.3%
    1.0% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 3.3% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    5.3%
    SoloQ
    4.2%
    5.3% ban rate in amateur play over 1,807 games, against 4.2% in soloQ over 189,162 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.6 min
    SoloQ
    27.7 min
    Median of 29.6 min in amateur play, against 27.7 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Hail of Blades, then Stormsurge, Dusk and Dawn, and Rabadon's Deathcap: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesHail of Blades92% · 22,612
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ignite60% · 14,685
Amateur: Flash + Teleport (51%), gap not settled
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 144 games
Core (3 legendaries)44% · 5,655
44%of soloQ games
  1. Stormsurge
  2. Dusk and Dawn
  3. Rabadon's Deathcap
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Map pressure first: more map pressure than 79% of mid laners.

  1. Map pressuretop21%3.8 · mid laners: 3.2

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

  • Map pressure
  • Split-push

Like other mid laners

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Crowd control (CC)
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • Carries its own kills
  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 53 in lane, 54 in mid game and 45 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

533+5 vs 528
918+18 vs 899
1,166-12 vs 1,179
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Ekkomid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 71% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners
3.8takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 53 of 100 among mid laners533 · median 528
  • Damage in mid game · rank 54 of 100 among mid laners918 · median 899
  • Damage in late game · rank 45 of 100 among mid laners1,166 · median 1,179
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 63 of 100 among mid laners+140 · median +25
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 71 of 100 among mid laners+311 · median +71
  • Map pressure · rank 79 of 100 among mid laners3.8 · median 3.2
  • Absorbs damage · rank 68 of 100 among mid laners652 · median 489
  • Plays teamfights · rank 27 of 100 among mid laners53% · median 55%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 69 of 100 among mid laners25% · median 23%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 12 of 100 among mid lanersrank 12 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 39 of 100 among mid laners0.6 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 66 of 100 among mid laners23% · median 21%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected
Syndra44.4% · expected 38.5% · 36 g+5.9 ptSoloQ +1.8
ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top10 champions
  • Ornn17 games
    —SoloQ: 51.6% · 756 g
  • Ambessa7 games
    —SoloQ: 49.9% · 551 g
  • K'Sante7 games
    —SoloQ: 55.0% · 500 g
  • Malphite7 games
    —SoloQ: 48.3% · 753 g
  • Olaf7 games
    —SoloQ: 50.6% · 391 g
Jungle7 champions
  • Wukong24 games
    —SoloQ: 49.9% · 905 g
  • Jarvan IV21 games
    —SoloQ: 48.9% · 943 g
  • Vi12 games
    —SoloQ: 51.8% · 446 g
  • Amumu8 games
    —SoloQ: 55.6% · 108 g
  • Xin Zhao7 games
    —SoloQ: 46.5% · 286 g
Mid5 champions
  • Syndra36 games
    44.4%gap +5.9 ptsSoloQ: 51.6% · 1,360 g
  • Orianna15 games
    —SoloQ: 55.2% · 462 g
  • Viktor11 games
    —SoloQ: 53.9% · 895 g
  • Ahri9 games
    —SoloQ: 48.8% · 1,329 g
  • Sylas5 games
    —SoloQ: 48.6% · 1,016 g
ADC14 champions
  • Jinx15 games
    —SoloQ: 48.7% · 1,429 g
  • Kai'Sa12 games
    —SoloQ: 51.7% · 1,923 g
  • Yunara12 games
    —SoloQ: 50.0% · 1,734 g
  • Caitlyn11 games
    —SoloQ: 49.9% · 1,336 g
  • Ezreal8 games
    —SoloQ: 51.9% · 1,213 g
Support11 champions
  • Nautilus17 games
    —SoloQ: 51.5% · 1,339 g
  • Lulu12 games
    —SoloQ: 50.4% · 1,721 g
  • Karma11 games
    —SoloQ: 50.0% · 1,019 g
  • Blitzcrank9 games
    —SoloQ: 49.0% · 839 g
  • Milio9 games
    —SoloQ: 53.9% · 759 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Fallback pick: comes out late in the series, once the pool has emptied.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+3.3%17,579 picks of 537,260ban 4.2% · patches 16.20 to 16.22
  • Amateur tournaments1.0%96 picks of 10,100ban 5.3% · patches 16.20 to 16.22
  • Pro0.1%2 picks of 2,258bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

5.3% on 16.22
16.1216.22
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
  • 1.5%G137 games of 2,550
  • 1.9%G249 games of 2,550
  • 2.1%G3+17 games of 811
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 37 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.