Tournament presence · pick + ban
18.0%#40 of 173 champions
Pick
7.2%picked in 1,350 of 18,759 games
Ban
10.8%1,909 bans over 17,736 games, against 4.3% in soloQ
Win rate as Top52.9% between 50.4% and 55.3% over 1,103 gamesSoloQ 50.0%: clear gap
Median length28.7 minsoloQ 26 min

Amateur: 18,564 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 242,675 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • Win rateWins more in amateur play
    Amateur
    52.9%
    SoloQ
    50.0%
    52.9% win rate in amateur play over 1,103 games, against 50.0% in soloQ over 11,019 games.
  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    2.0%
    SoloQ
    1.4%
    2.0% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.4% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    6.6%
    SoloQ
    4.3%
    6.6% ban rate in amateur play over 8,650 games, against 4.3% in soloQ over 165,977 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.7 min
    SoloQ
    26 min
    Median of 28.7 min in amateur play, against 26 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Fleet Footwork, then Trinity Force, Frozen Heart, and Spirit Visage: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesFleet Footwork62% · 6,795
Same in amateur play
SpellsGhost + Teleport50% · 5,511
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 99% · 226 games
Core (3 legendaries)19% · 709
19%of soloQ games
  1. Trinity Force
  2. Frozen Heart
  3. Spirit Visage
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Absorbs damage first: absorbs more than 94% of top laners.

  1. Absorbs damagetop7%1,565 · top laners: 970

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

  • Frontline
  • Split-push

Like other top laners

  • Gold at 20 min
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Crowd control (CC)
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 15 in lane, 91 in mid game and 77 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

537-62 vs 599
978+110 vs 868
1,171+92 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Nasustop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 73% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 15 of 100 among top laners537 · median 599
  • Damage in mid game · rank 91 of 100 among top laners978 · median 868
  • Damage in late game · rank 77 of 100 among top laners1,171 · median 1,079
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 16 of 100 among top laners-404 · median +119
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 28 of 100 among top laners-177 · median +100
  • Absorbs damage · rank 94 of 100 among top laners1,565 · median 970
  • Plays teamfights · rank 57 of 100 among top laners54% · median 53%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 55 of 100 among top laners29% · median 28%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 72 of 100 among top lanersrank 72 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 40 of 100 among top laners0.7 · median 0.8
  • Team damage · rank 59 of 100 among top laners22% · median 20%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Braum in amateur play: +12.0 pts over 74 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Garen60.5% · expected 50.3% · 43 g+10.1 ptSoloQ -6.6
Aatrox61.3% · expected 52.3% · 31 g+9.0 ptSoloQ -4.5
Dr. Mundo60.4% · expected 55.3% · 53 g+5.0 ptSoloQ +1.5
Olaf57.5% · expected 51.4% · 40 g+6.1 ptSoloQ +0.7
Mordekaiser58.1% · expected 51.9% · 31 g+6.2 ptSoloQ +0.6
Junglegap to expected
Wukong57.8% · expected 48.1% · 64 g+9.7 ptSoloQ +0.3
Lee Sin55.4% · expected 54.0% · 121 g+1.4 ptSoloQ -1.0
Lillia57.6% · expected 50.1% · 33 g+7.5 ptSoloQ -1.7
Midgap to expected
Vex66.7% · expected 51.6% · 30 g+15.1 ptSoloQ +1.1
Orianna63.6% · expected 56.3% · 44 g+7.3 ptSoloQ -1.3
Lissandra58.0% · expected 53.8% · 50 g+4.2 ptSoloQ +0.7
Sylas56.7% · expected 54.7% · 67 g+2.0 ptSoloQ -1.5
Galio57.1% · expected 53.3% · 35 g+3.8 ptSoloQ +3.4
ADCgap to expected
Tristana67.4% · expected 54.0% · 43 g+13.4 ptSoloQ -2.1
Xayah59.3% · expected 50.8% · 54 g+8.4 ptSoloQ -1.9
Jhin62.7% · expected 57.0% · 67 g+5.7 ptSoloQ -1.5
Caitlyn54.1% · expected 50.6% · 85 g+3.6 ptSoloQ +0.9
Lucian57.1% · expected 53.7% · 70 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +0.5
Supportgap to expected
Braum62.2% · expected 50.2% · 74 g+12.0 ptSoloQ -2.6
Seraphine62.3% · expected 52.0% · 61 g+10.3 ptSoloQ +2.3
Rakan59.6% · expected 53.6% · 47 g+5.9 ptSoloQ -3.9
Rell54.8% · expected 48.4% · 42 g+6.4 ptSoloQ -1.8
Blitzcrank53.3% · expected 51.5% · 45 g+1.9 ptSoloQ +1.7

With

Junglegap to expected
Sejuani71.0% · expected 53.9% · 31 g+17.1 ptSoloQ +0.9
Vi54.2% · expected 53.0% · 72 g+1.2 ptSoloQ +1.7
Lillia60.6% · expected 55.6% · 33 g+5.0 ptSoloQ +3.6
Viego54.3% · expected 52.7% · 35 g+1.5 ptSoloQ +0.8
Midgap to expected
Syndra61.9% · expected 53.6% · 63 g+8.3 ptSoloQ +1.6
Vex62.5% · expected 54.1% · 32 g+8.4 ptSoloQ -6.3
Akali56.4% · expected 51.8% · 39 g+4.7 ptSoloQ -4.9
Aurora58.1% · expected 52.5% · 31 g+5.5 ptSoloQ +2.1
LeBlanc56.3% · expected 52.9% · 32 g+3.3 ptSoloQ -0.6
ADCgap to expected
Caitlyn65.2% · expected 55.1% · 92 g+10.1 ptSoloQ +0.5
Lucian58.3% · expected 52.0% · 72 g+6.3 ptSoloQ -1.1
Tristana62.5% · expected 51.7% · 32 g+10.8 ptSoloQ +1.0
Sivir62.5% · expected 53.3% · 40 g+9.2 ptSoloQ +1.3
Kai'Sa57.8% · expected 52.9% · 90 g+4.9 ptSoloQ -1.4
Supportgap to expected
Alistar67.9% · expected 54.6% · 56 g+13.2 ptSoloQ -0.5
Milio63.2% · expected 51.7% · 57 g+11.5 ptSoloQ -7.4
Nautilus55.8% · expected 50.5% · 113 g+5.2 ptSoloQ +0.3
Lulu54.5% · expected 51.0% · 99 g+3.6 ptSoloQ +2.3
Blitzcrank56.5% · expected 54.2% · 62 g+2.2 ptSoloQ -2.7

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top25 champions
  • Malphite108 games
    50.0%gap -0.8 ptsSoloQ: 53.7% · 460 g
  • Ornn62 games
    43.5%gap -7.5 ptsSoloQ: 50.8% · 128 g
  • Sion54 games
    50.0%gap -2.3 ptsSoloQ: 47.0% · 166 g
  • Dr. Mundo53 games
    60.4%gap +5.0 ptsSoloQ: 52.7% · 296 g
  • Garen43 games
    60.5%gap +10.1 ptsSoloQ: 42.6% · 298 g
Jungle21 champions
  • Lee Sin121 games
    55.4%gap +1.4 ptsSoloQ: 49.0% · 1,301 g
  • Jarvan IV71 games
    54.9%gap -0.4 ptsSoloQ: 46.9% · 369 g
  • Vi71 games
    49.3%gap -3.4 ptsSoloQ: 51.7% · 329 g
  • Wukong64 games
    57.8%gap +9.7 ptsSoloQ: 49.8% · 261 g
  • Sylas57 games
    45.6%gap -6.4 ptsSoloQ: 47.8% · 483 g
Mid19 champions
  • Sylas67 games
    56.7%gap +2.0 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 565 g
  • Ahri62 games
    46.8%gap -3.0 ptsSoloQ: 49.9% · 367 g
  • Syndra54 games
    44.4%gap -7.7 ptsSoloQ: 50.5% · 473 g
  • Viktor54 games
    53.7%gap +0.7 ptsSoloQ: 48.9% · 560 g
  • Lissandra50 games
    58.0%gap +4.2 ptsSoloQ: 48.8% · 303 g
ADC16 champions
  • Yunara120 games
    46.7%gap -4.1 ptsSoloQ: 49.6% · 829 g
  • Kai'Sa96 games
    47.9%gap -4.9 ptsSoloQ: 52.8% · 1,324 g
  • Caitlyn85 games
    54.1%gap +3.6 ptsSoloQ: 52.3% · 575 g
  • Ezreal77 games
    57.1%gap 0.0 ptsSoloQ: 55.7% · 750 g
  • Lucian70 games
    57.1%gap +3.5 ptsSoloQ: 52.0% · 485 g
Support17 champions
  • Lulu103 games
    50.5%gap -4.3 ptsSoloQ: 49.0% · 863 g
  • Nautilus94 games
    47.9%gap -7.3 ptsSoloQ: 47.5% · 802 g
  • Leona86 games
    52.3%gap -0.4 ptsSoloQ: 48.5% · 433 g
  • Braum74 games
    62.2%gap +12.0 ptsSoloQ: 45.4% · 350 g
  • Milio74 games
    52.7%gap -1.3 ptsSoloQ: 55.0% · 222 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.4%6,892 picks of 485,348ban 4.3% · patches 16.20 to 16.22
  • Amateur tournaments2.0%377 picks of 18,436ban 6.6% · patches 16.20 to 16.22
  • Pro0.6%13 picks of 2,258bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

7.1% on 16.22
16.1216.22
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
  • 5.5%G1243 games of 4,412
  • 5.2%G2230 games of 4,412
  • 5.9%G3+112 games of 1,912
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 243 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.