Tournament presence · pick + ban
13.4%#55 of 173 champions
Pick
7.4%picked in 542 of 7,333 games
Ban
6.0%206 bans over 3,438 games, against 3.3% in soloQ
Win rate as Top56.0% between 52.3% and 59.6% over 495 gamesSoloQ 51.4%: clear gap
Median length29.4 minsoloQ 27.4 min

Amateur: 7,832 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 261,868 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

5 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • Win rateWins more in amateur play
    Amateur
    56.0%
    SoloQ
    51.4%
    56.0% win rate in amateur play over 495 games, against 51.4% in soloQ over 23,703 games.
  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    3.5%
    SoloQ
    3.1%
    3.5% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 3.1% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    5.9%
    SoloQ
    3.3%
    5.9% ban rate in amateur play over 2,305 games, against 3.3% in soloQ over 182,390 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.4 min
    SoloQ
    27.4 min
    Median of 29.4 min in amateur play, against 27.4 min in soloQ.
  • SpellsFlash + Teleport instead of Flash + Ignite
    Amateur
    53%
    SoloQ
    64%
    Played in 53% of amateur games; soloQ sticks to Flash + Ignite (64%).
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Grasp of the Undying, then Trinity Force, Ravenous Hydra, and Death's Dance: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesGrasp of the Undying77% · 18,340
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ignite64% · 15,052
≠ Amateur: Flash + Teleport instead of Flash + Ignite. 53% · 522 games
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 159 games
Core (3 legendaries)44% · 4,503
44%of soloQ games
  1. Trinity Force
  2. Ravenous Hydra
  3. Death's Dance
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Team damage first: more damage than 88% of top laners.

  1. Team damagetop12%25% · top laners: 20%
  2. Takes its kills in duelstop25%31% · top laners: 28%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

  • Duelist
  • Damage
  • Split-push

Like other top laners

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Crowd control (CC)

What it is not

  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 65 in lane, 89 in mid game and 60 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

629+30 vs 599
970+102 vs 868
1,110+30 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Camilletop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 71% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 65 of 100 among top laners629 · median 599
  • Damage in mid game · rank 89 of 100 among top laners970 · median 868
  • Damage in late game · rank 60 of 100 among top laners1,110 · median 1,079
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 53 of 100 among top laners+121 · median +119
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 71 of 100 among top laners+353 · median +100
  • Absorbs damage · rank 67 of 100 among top laners1,129 · median 970
  • Plays teamfights · rank 27 of 100 among top laners51% · median 53%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 75 of 100 among top laners31% · median 28%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 24 of 100 among top lanersrank 24 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 51 of 100 among top laners0.8 · median 0.8
  • Team damage · rank 88 of 100 among top laners25% · median 20%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Ambessa in amateur play: +13.2 pts over 41 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Ambessa68.3% · expected 55.0% · 41 g+13.2 ptSoloQ +0.4
K'Sante62.9% · expected 56.7% · 35 g+6.1 ptSoloQ +3.2
Junglegap to expected
Jarvan IV63.6% · expected 56.4% · 55 g+7.2 ptSoloQ -0.5
Midgap to expected
Ahri60.0% · expected 55.9% · 45 g+4.1 ptSoloQ +1.4
ADCgap to expected
Yunara55.4% · expected 53.2% · 56 g+2.2 ptSoloQ +0.5
Supportgap to expected
Braum68.3% · expected 58.0% · 41 g+10.3 ptSoloQ +0.5
Karma67.7% · expected 57.1% · 31 g+10.7 ptSoloQ -0.6
Seraphine59.4% · expected 57.7% · 32 g+1.6 ptSoloQ -3.1
Milio57.6% · expected 56.8% · 33 g+0.8 ptSoloQ +1.6

With

Junglegap to expected
Wukong66.7% · expected 56.0% · 66 g+10.6 ptSoloQ +0.8
Vi60.0% · expected 56.4% · 35 g+3.6 ptSoloQ -0.8
Midgap to expected
Orianna61.8% · expected 57.3% · 55 g+4.5 ptSoloQ +0.9
ADCgap to expected
Yunara69.8% · expected 58.7% · 43 g+11.1 ptSoloQ +0.2
Ashe62.2% · expected 53.9% · 37 g+8.2 ptSoloQ -1.1
Kai'Sa60.5% · expected 52.8% · 38 g+7.7 ptSoloQ -1.3
Ezreal54.8% · expected 54.1% · 31 g+0.7 ptSoloQ +0.5
Supportgap to expected
Seraphine68.6% · expected 54.2% · 35 g+14.4 ptSoloQ +0.7
Nautilus63.9% · expected 59.3% · 61 g+4.6 ptSoloQ -1.3
Lulu56.5% · expected 54.0% · 46 g+2.5 ptSoloQ +1.1
Milio57.1% · expected 55.1% · 35 g+2.0 ptSoloQ +1.8

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top20 champions
  • Ornn88 games
    53.4%gap -3.8 ptsSoloQ: 51.7% · 804 g
  • Ambessa41 games
    68.3%gap +13.2 ptsSoloQ: 54.7% · 774 g
  • K'Sante35 games
    62.9%gap +6.1 ptsSoloQ: 57.5% · 456 g
  • Olaf29 games
    —SoloQ: 53.2% · 573 g
  • Renekton27 games
    —SoloQ: 51.1% · 1,091 g
Jungle21 champions
  • Wukong63 games
    55.6%gap -0.3 ptsSoloQ: 48.8% · 889 g
  • Jarvan IV55 games
    63.6%gap +7.2 ptsSoloQ: 51.0% · 993 g
  • Vi42 games
    54.8%gap -0.7 ptsSoloQ: 52.4% · 452 g
  • Xin Zhao36 games
    55.6%gap -0.6 ptsSoloQ: 47.9% · 317 g
  • Nocturne23 games
    —SoloQ: 51.1% · 311 g
Mid17 champions
  • Syndra54 games
    46.3%gap -8.0 ptsSoloQ: 52.8% · 1,236 g
  • Ahri45 games
    60.0%gap +4.1 ptsSoloQ: 51.3% · 1,363 g
  • Viktor43 games
    53.5%gap -1.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.9% · 917 g
  • Orianna40 games
    52.5%gap -2.1 ptsSoloQ: 52.2% · 435 g
  • Hwei25 games
    —SoloQ: 50.5% · 519 g
ADC17 champions
  • Yunara56 games
    55.4%gap +2.2 ptsSoloQ: 51.6% · 1,760 g
  • Kai'Sa41 games
    53.7%gap -5.4 ptsSoloQ: 51.2% · 1,794 g
  • Jinx39 games
    48.7%gap -9.5 ptsSoloQ: 47.1% · 1,328 g
  • Ashe35 games
    54.3%gap -3.7 ptsSoloQ: 52.5% · 520 g
  • Xayah35 games
    40.0%gap -15.9 ptsSoloQ: 45.9% · 679 g
Support16 champions
  • Lulu47 games
    57.4%gap -0.4 ptsSoloQ: 49.6% · 1,635 g
  • Braum41 games
    68.3%gap +10.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.1% · 779 g
  • Nautilus36 games
    44.4%gap -8.1 ptsSoloQ: 50.5% · 1,365 g
  • Rakan35 games
    40.0%gap -13.1 ptsSoloQ: 52.8% · 710 g
  • Milio33 games
    57.6%gap +0.8 ptsSoloQ: 53.8% · 727 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+3.1%16,182 picks of 523,732ban 3.3% · patches 16.20 to 16.22
  • Amateur tournaments3.5%409 picks of 11,836ban 5.9% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro5.2%116 picks of 2,252bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

16.5% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
  • 6.3%G1146 games of 2,328
  • 7.2%G2168 games of 2,328
  • 7.3%G3+54 games of 742
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 146 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.