Champion sheet · Support

Renata Glasc

Patches 16.20 to 16.22 · KR

Tournament presence · pick + ban

3.0%#138 of 173 champions

Pick: 2.3%picked in 439 of 18,759 games
Ban: 0.7%125 bans over 17,736 games, against 0.4% in soloQ

Win rate as Support51.6% between 47.7% and 55.5% over 438 gamesSoloQ 49.5%: no clear gap

Median length28.5 minsoloQ 25.4 min

Amateur: 18,564 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 242,675 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Support.DraftLength
How to play itGuardian: the most played keystone in soloQ, the core is still to be measured.
In a compPlays teamfights first: more teamfights than 100% of supports.Teamfight
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftFallback pick: comes out late in the series, once the pool has emptied.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Support.

DraftPicked more often in amateur play
Amateur
1.2%
SoloQ
1.0%
1.2% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.0% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
0.8%
SoloQ
0.4%
0.8% ban rate in amateur play over 8,650 games, against 0.4% in soloQ over 165,977 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
28.5 min
SoloQ
25.4 min
Median of 28.5 min in amateur play, against 25.4 min in soloQ.

Not enough games to judge: core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Guardian: the most played keystone in soloQ, the core is still to be measured.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesGuardian90% · 5,737

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Heal93% · 5,938

Same in amateur play

SkillsEnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 86% · 316 games

Core (3 legendaries)

No choice measured.

SoloQ core not measured: too few games with items read.

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Plays teamfights first: more teamfights than 100% of supports.

Plays teamfightstop1%60% · supports: 54%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other supports

What marks it

Teamfight

Like other supports

Damage in lane
Gold at 15 min
Gold at 20 min
Map pressure
Absorbs damage
Crowd control (CC)

What it is not

Few duels
Little damage
No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 32 in lane, 18 in mid game and 16 in late game, out of 100 supports.

240-48 vs 288

262-80 vs 342

274-114 vs 388

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Renata Glascsupports

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 73% of supports against the direct opponent.

supports

4.3takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; supports: 4.5.

Where it stands among supports · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 32 of 100 among supports240 · median 288
Damage in mid game · rank 18 of 100 among supports262 · median 342
Damage in late game · rank 16 of 100 among supports274 · median 388
Gold at 15 min · rank 25 of 100 among supports-73 · median +105
Gold at 20 min · rank 27 of 100 among supports-63 · median +193
Map pressure · rank 39 of 100 among supports4.3 · median 4.5
Absorbs damage · rank 63 of 100 among supports536 · median 393
Plays teamfights · rank 100 of 100 among supports60% · median 54%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 20 of 100 among supports14% · median 17%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 79 of 100 among supportsrank 79 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 27 of 100 among supports0.9 · median 1
Team damage · rank 22 of 100 among supports8% · median 9%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Wukong58.1% · expected 46.8% · 31 g+11.2 ptSoloQ +2.7

Lee Sin61.3% · expected 52.7% · 31 g+8.6 ptSoloQ -2.3

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

Jhin65.8% · expected 55.8% · 38 g+10.0 ptSoloQ -0.1

Caitlyn58.8% · expected 49.3% · 34 g+9.5 ptSoloQ +1.7

Ashe51.4% · expected 48.2% · 37 g+3.1 ptSoloQ +1.2

Kai'Sa54.5% · expected 51.6% · 33 g+3.0 ptSoloQ +2.4

Supportgap to expected

Nautilus60.8% · expected 53.9% · 51 g+6.9 ptSoloQ +5.2

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Wukong65.7% · expected 56.3% · 35 g+9.4 ptSoloQ -3.5

Lee Sin51.0% · expected 50.5% · 49 g+0.6 ptSoloQ -0.4

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

Varus55.1% · expected 52.0% · 49 g+3.1 ptSoloQ +3.3

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top19 champions