udrafter
Champion sheet · Support

Braum

Patches 16.20 to 16.22 · EUW
Tournament presence · pick + ban
25.0%#16 of 173 champions
Pick
14.4%picked in 1,064 of 7,386 games
Ban
10.6%369 bans over 3,478 games, against 13.3% in soloQ
Win rate as Support47.9% between 45.4% and 50.5% over 1,064 gamesSoloQ 51.8%: clear gap
Median length28.9 minsoloQ 27.3 min

Amateur: 7,832 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 261,868 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Support.

  • Win rateWins less in amateur play
    Amateur
    47.9%
    SoloQ
    51.8%
    47.9% win rate in amateur play over 1,064 games, against 51.8% in soloQ over 27,378 games.
  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    7.1%
    SoloQ
    3.4%
    7.1% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 3.4% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    10.3%
    SoloQ
    13.3%
    10.3% ban rate in amateur play over 2,305 games, against 13.3% in soloQ over 182,390 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.9 min
    SoloQ
    27.3 min
    Median of 28.9 min in amateur play, against 27.3 min in soloQ.

Not enough games to judge: core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Guardian, then Kaenic Rookern, Protoplasm Harness, and Force of Nature: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesGuardian94% · 25,677
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Heal54% · 14,764
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 82% · 228 games
Core (3 legendaries)— · 1
  1. Kaenic Rookern
  2. Protoplasm Harness
  3. Force of Nature

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Plays teamfights first: more teamfights than 98% of supports.

  1. Plays teamfightstop2%59% · supports: 54%
  2. Absorbs damagetop14%846 · supports: 393
  3. Lets allies carry killstop17%rank 83 of 100

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other supports

What marks it

  • Frontline
  • Teamfight
  • Lets allies carry
  • CC

Like other supports

  • Map pressure

What it is not

  • Few duels
  • Little damage
  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 16 in lane, 20 in mid game and 20 in late game, out of 100 supports.

218-70 vs 288
264-78 vs 342
287-101 vs 388
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Braumsupports

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 92% of supports against the direct opponent.

supports
4.5takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; supports: 4.5.

Where it stands among supports · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 16 of 100 among supports218 · median 288
  • Damage in mid game · rank 20 of 100 among supports264 · median 342
  • Damage in late game · rank 20 of 100 among supports287 · median 388
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 5 of 100 among supports-144 · median +105
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 9 of 100 among supports-195 · median +193
  • Map pressure · rank 46 of 100 among supports4.5 · median 4.5
  • Absorbs damage · rank 86 of 100 among supports846 · median 393
  • Plays teamfights · rank 98 of 100 among supports59% · median 54%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 3 of 100 among supports12% · median 17%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 83 of 100 among supportsrank 83 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 76 of 100 among supports1.3 · median 1
  • Team damage · rank 14 of 100 among supports7% · median 9%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Ezreal in amateur play: +15.8 pts over 38 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Ornn58.1% · expected 49.3% · 105 g+8.8 ptSoloQ +0.1
Olaf47.3% · expected 39.8% · 55 g+7.5 ptSoloQ -2.0
Sion49.3% · expected 47.4% · 69 g+1.8 ptSoloQ -3.9
Shen57.6% · expected 51.9% · 33 g+5.7 ptSoloQ -1.6
Zaahen45.2% · expected 44.3% · 31 g+0.9 ptSoloQ -3.4
Junglegap to expected
Jarvan IV56.1% · expected 48.4% · 98 g+7.7 ptSoloQ +0.2
Trundle56.7% · expected 44.6% · 30 g+12.1 ptSoloQ -0.7
Lee Sin48.6% · expected 41.4% · 37 g+7.3 ptSoloQ -2.0
Lillia50.0% · expected 43.0% · 34 g+7.0 ptSoloQ -4.6
Xin Zhao49.3% · expected 48.3% · 69 g+1.0 ptSoloQ -3.5
Midgap to expected
Orianna53.0% · expected 46.4% · 83 g+6.6 ptSoloQ +0.6
Aurora57.1% · expected 51.6% · 35 g+5.6 ptSoloQ +3.2
ADCgap to expected
Ezreal65.8% · expected 50.0% · 38 g+15.8 ptSoloQ +3.7
Jinx59.4% · expected 50.2% · 69 g+9.3 ptSoloQ -3.1
Sivir55.8% · expected 50.1% · 52 g+5.6 ptSoloQ +1.0
Xayah51.6% · expected 47.7% · 62 g+3.9 ptSoloQ +1.5
Tristana46.2% · expected 44.8% · 91 g+1.4 ptSoloQ +0.2
Supportgap to expected
Nautilus48.6% · expected 44.5% · 175 g+4.0 ptSoloQ +3.2
Lulu54.2% · expected 50.0% · 107 g+4.2 ptSoloQ +1.4
Rell50.0% · expected 43.7% · 54 g+6.3 ptSoloQ -1.7
Milio52.6% · expected 49.0% · 76 g+3.6 ptSoloQ -2.5
Alistar52.3% · expected 46.4% · 44 g+5.9 ptSoloQ -1.2

With

Topgap to expected
Shen55.9% · expected 44.0% · 34 g+11.8 ptSoloQ +0.8
Aatrox64.5% · expected 52.8% · 31 g+11.7 ptSoloQ +2.6
Renekton57.9% · expected 51.1% · 57 g+6.8 ptSoloQ +1.3
Ornn48.6% · expected 46.6% · 105 g+2.0 ptSoloQ -1.0
Malphite44.7% · expected 40.6% · 47 g+4.0 ptSoloQ +0.4
Junglegap to expected
Sejuani50.0% · expected 41.9% · 52 g+8.1 ptSoloQ -4.4
Skarner54.8% · expected 44.9% · 31 g+9.9 ptSoloQ +5.9
Xin Zhao50.6% · expected 47.6% · 87 g+3.0 ptSoloQ +2.9
Vi50.0% · expected 48.7% · 54 g+1.3 ptSoloQ +0.7
Midgap to expected
Ahri58.5% · expected 47.9% · 106 g+10.6 ptSoloQ -1.4
Hwei58.2% · expected 49.1% · 55 g+9.0 ptSoloQ +7.2
Viktor52.6% · expected 48.4% · 116 g+4.2 ptSoloQ -0.5
Lissandra52.6% · expected 47.0% · 38 g+5.7 ptSoloQ +2.5
Locke56.7% · expected 52.1% · 30 g+4.5 ptSoloQ +0.6
ADCgap to expected
Sivir56.1% · expected 45.7% · 82 g+10.3 ptSoloQ +2.3
Yunara56.4% · expected 50.6% · 165 g+5.7 ptSoloQ +3.1
Jinx52.1% · expected 45.7% · 117 g+6.4 ptSoloQ +1.0
Ezreal48.5% · expected 45.9% · 66 g+2.6 ptSoloQ -2.5

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top24 champions
  • Ornn105 games
    58.1%gap +8.8 ptsSoloQ: 50.6% · 788 g
  • Sion69 games
    49.3%gap +1.8 ptsSoloQ: 48.4% · 550 g
  • K'Sante65 games
    46.2%gap -2.4 ptsSoloQ: 54.3% · 527 g
  • Olaf55 games
    47.3%gap +7.5 ptsSoloQ: 49.6% · 570 g
  • Malphite50 games
    44.0%gap -11.3 ptsSoloQ: 49.5% · 852 g
Jungle22 champions
  • Wukong155 games
    46.5%gap -1.5 ptsSoloQ: 48.2% · 1,133 g
  • Jarvan IV98 games
    56.1%gap +7.7 ptsSoloQ: 52.0% · 1,099 g
  • Xin Zhao69 games
    49.3%gap +1.0 ptsSoloQ: 48.4% · 351 g
  • Vi62 games
    45.2%gap -2.0 ptsSoloQ: 56.8% · 507 g
  • Nocturne52 games
    42.3%gap -8.5 ptsSoloQ: 56.3% · 348 g
Mid23 champions
  • Syndra137 games
    40.9%gap -5.5 ptsSoloQ: 52.2% · 1,386 g
  • Viktor95 games
    46.3%gap -1.2 ptsSoloQ: 51.1% · 1,014 g
  • Ahri89 games
    46.1%gap -1.9 ptsSoloQ: 54.0% · 1,460 g
  • Orianna83 games
    53.0%gap +6.6 ptsSoloQ: 54.6% · 575 g
  • Akali37 games
    37.8%gap -4.0 ptsSoloQ: 51.0% · 867 g
ADC18 champions
  • Kai'Sa129 games
    48.8%gap -2.1 ptsSoloQ: 55.2% · 2,631 g
  • Tristana91 games
    46.2%gap +1.4 ptsSoloQ: 49.8% · 2,091 g
  • Yunara84 games
    42.9%gap -2.4 ptsSoloQ: 51.0% · 1,725 g
  • Jinx69 games
    59.4%gap +9.3 ptsSoloQ: 47.4% · 1,434 g
  • Ashe66 games
    39.4%gap -10.7 ptsSoloQ: 52.2% · 554 g
Support18 champions
  • Nautilus175 games
    48.6%gap +4.0 ptsSoloQ: 55.8% · 3,090 g
  • Lulu107 games
    54.2%gap +4.2 ptsSoloQ: 52.8% · 1,792 g
  • Rakan83 games
    37.3%gap -7.7 ptsSoloQ: 47.8% · 1,058 g
  • Milio76 games
    52.6%gap +3.6 ptsSoloQ: 50.1% · 791 g
  • Seraphine72 games
    38.9%gap -10.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.1% · 511 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Priority pick: taken in G1, burned afterwards.

Pick rate as Support

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+3.4%17,999 picks of 523,735ban 13.3% · patches 16.20 to 16.22
  • Amateur tournaments7.1%840 picks of 11,836ban 10.3% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro1.2%26 picks of 2,252bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

23.8% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Support
  • 16.2%G1378 games of 2,338
  • 13.2%G2309 games of 2,338
  • 12.1%G3+91 games of 749
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 378 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.