Tournament presence · pick + ban
7.8%#88 of 173 champions
Pick
2.4%picked in 177 of 7,414 games
Ban
5.4%189 bans over 3,501 games, against 20.8% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid59.3% between 52.2% and 66.0% over 135 gamesSoloQ 50.6%: clear gap
Median length29.2 minsoloQ 28.1 min

Amateur: 7,832 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 261,868 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • Win rateWins more in amateur play
    Amateur
    59.3%
    SoloQ
    50.6%
    59.3% win rate in amateur play over 135 games, against 50.6% in soloQ over 26,961 games.
  • DraftPicked less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    0.8%
    SoloQ
    3.4%
    0.8% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 3.4% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    4.3%
    SoloQ
    20.8%
    4.3% ban rate in amateur play over 2,305 games, against 20.8% in soloQ over 182,390 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.2 min
    SoloQ
    28.1 min
    Median of 29.2 min in amateur play, against 28.1 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

First Strike, then Voltaic Cyclosword, Bastionbreaker, and Lord Dominik's Regards: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesFirst Strike68% · 18,357
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ignite83% · 22,384
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 35 games
Core (3 legendaries)21% · 3,832
21%of soloQ games
  1. Voltaic Cyclosword
  2. Bastionbreaker
  3. Lord Dominik's Regards
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Team damage first: more damage than 98% of mid laners.

  1. Team damagetop2%27% · mid laners: 21%
  2. Takes its kills in duelstop5%30% · mid laners: 23%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

  • Duelist
  • Damage
  • Poke
  • Split-push

Like other mid laners

  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Map pressure
  • Absorbs damage

What it is not

  • Few teamfights
  • Carries its own kills
  • Little CC

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 94 in lane, 71 in mid game and 59 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

609+81 vs 528
955+56 vs 899
1,200+22 vs 1,179
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Zedmid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 98% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners
4takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 94 of 100 among mid laners609 · median 528
  • Damage in mid game · rank 71 of 100 among mid laners955 · median 899
  • Damage in late game · rank 59 of 100 among mid laners1,200 · median 1,179
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 99 of 100 among mid laners+656 · median +25
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 98 of 100 among mid laners+1,121 · median +71
  • Map pressure · rank 70 of 100 among mid laners4 · median 3.2
  • Absorbs damage · rank 49 of 100 among mid laners481 · median 489
  • Plays teamfights · rank 13 of 100 among mid laners51% · median 55%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 95 of 100 among mid laners30% · median 23%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 18 of 100 among mid lanersrank 18 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 20 of 100 among mid laners0.3 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 98 of 100 among mid laners27% · median 21%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top6 champions
  • Ornn10 games
    —SoloQ: 50.4% · 785 g
  • Ambessa7 games
    —SoloQ: 54.0% · 650 g
  • Camille6 games
    —SoloQ: 46.2% · 840 g
  • K'Sante6 games
    —SoloQ: 55.4% · 578 g
  • Gnar5 games
    —SoloQ: 53.8% · 599 g
Jungle9 champions
  • Jarvan IV14 games
    —SoloQ: 51.8% · 1,091 g
  • Wukong13 games
    —SoloQ: 48.3% · 1,008 g
  • Vi12 games
    —SoloQ: 52.1% · 524 g
  • Nocturne11 games
    —SoloQ: 54.2% · 354 g
  • Xin Zhao9 games
    —SoloQ: 51.3% · 353 g
Mid6 champions
  • Syndra23 games
    —SoloQ: 49.1% · 1,150 g
  • Ahri13 games
    —SoloQ: 51.5% · 1,651 g
  • Sylas7 games
    —SoloQ: 46.7% · 960 g
  • Viktor7 games
    —SoloQ: 48.2% · 869 g
  • Hwei6 games
    —SoloQ: 50.0% · 456 g
ADC11 champions
  • Ezreal14 games
    —SoloQ: 53.7% · 1,428 g
  • Kai'Sa12 games
    —SoloQ: 51.3% · 2,099 g
  • Caitlyn9 games
    —SoloQ: 52.4% · 1,375 g
  • Yunara9 games
    —SoloQ: 50.7% · 1,917 g
  • Jinx8 games
    —SoloQ: 48.8% · 1,572 g
Support11 champions
  • Rell16 games
    —SoloQ: 51.0% · 832 g
  • Lulu13 games
    —SoloQ: 50.9% · 2,028 g
  • Braum11 games
    —SoloQ: 50.4% · 877 g
  • Karma11 games
    —SoloQ: 52.0% · 1,106 g
  • Thresh10 games
    —SoloQ: 48.7% · 1,905 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+3.4%17,895 picks of 523,734ban 20.8% · patches 16.20 to 16.22
  • Amateur tournaments0.8%99 picks of 11,836ban 4.3% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.1%3 picks of 2,252bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

15.1% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
  • 1.8%G142 games of 2,341
  • 1.7%G239 games of 2,341
  • 1.5%G3+11 games of 750
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 42 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.