Tournament presence · pick + ban
16.6%#41 of 173 champions
Pick
7.1%picked in 1,981 of 28,096 games
Ban
9.5%2,134 bans over 22,398 games, against 6.8% in soloQ
Win rate as Support49.4% between 46.7% and 52.1% over 933 gamesSoloQ 51.5%: no clear gap
Median length29.5 minsoloQ 27.2 min

Amateur: 29,590 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 63% · EUW 26% · NA 11%. SoloQ Master+: 661,121 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Support.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    1.6%
    SoloQ
    1.1%
    1.6% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.1% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    9.0%
    SoloQ
    6.8%
    9.0% ban rate in amateur play over 16,228 games, against 6.8% in soloQ over 457,860 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.5 min
    SoloQ
    27.2 min
    Median of 29.5 min in amateur play, against 27.2 min in soloQ.
  • SpellsFlash + Heal instead of Flash + Ignite
    Amateur
    58%
    SoloQ
    50%
    Played in 58% of amateur games; soloQ sticks to Flash + Ignite (50%).

Not enough games to judge: core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Aftershock, then Dead Man's Plate, Force of Nature, and Protoplasm Harness: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesAftershock58% · 12,377
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ignite50% · 10,859
≠ Amateur: Flash + Heal instead of Flash + Ignite. 58% · 1,158 games
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 91% · 192 games
Core (3 legendaries)13% · 78
13%of soloQ games
  1. Dead Man's Plate
  2. Force of Nature
  3. Protoplasm Harness
Amateur: Dead Man's Plate, Protoplasm Harness, Force of Nature, gap not settled

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Absorbs damage first: absorbs more than 88% of supports.

  1. Absorbs damagetop12%873 · supports: 393
  2. Map pressuretop15%4.9 · supports: 4.5

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other supports

What marks it

  • Map pressure
  • Frontline

Like other supports

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Crowd control (CC)
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 61 in lane, 63 in mid game and 61 in late game, out of 100 supports.

300+13 vs 288
405+63 vs 342
441+54 vs 388
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Poppysupports

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 53% of supports against the direct opponent.

supports
4.9takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; supports: 4.5.

Where it stands among supports · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 61 of 100 among supports300 · median 288
  • Damage in mid game · rank 63 of 100 among supports405 · median 342
  • Damage in late game · rank 61 of 100 among supports441 · median 388
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 49 of 100 among supports+95 · median +105
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 48 of 100 among supports+145 · median +193
  • Map pressure · rank 85 of 100 among supports4.9 · median 4.5
  • Absorbs damage · rank 88 of 100 among supports873 · median 393
  • Plays teamfights · rank 27 of 100 among supports51% · median 54%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 61 of 100 among supports19% · median 17%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 38 of 100 among supportsrank 38 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 64 of 100 among supports1.2 · median 1
  • Team damage · rank 59 of 100 among supports11% · median 9%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Mordekaiser in amateur play: +20.8 pts over 33 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Mordekaiser69.7% · expected 48.9% · 33 g+20.8 ptSoloQ +2.7
K'Sante56.8% · expected 51.7% · 37 g+5.1 ptSoloQ +2.7
Renekton51.2% · expected 47.7% · 41 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +3.4
Junglegap to expected
Qiyana56.3% · expected 46.8% · 32 g+9.4 ptSoloQ +0.3
Sylas52.9% · expected 48.6% · 51 g+4.4 ptSoloQ +2.5
Midgap to expected
Yone58.3% · expected 46.1% · 36 g+12.2 ptSoloQ +0.5
Akali53.8% · expected 48.4% · 39 g+5.5 ptSoloQ +0.4
Ahri48.3% · expected 47.7% · 87 g+0.6 ptSoloQ +2.3
Ryze54.5% · expected 50.7% · 33 g+3.9 ptSoloQ -2.9
Hwei51.4% · expected 48.6% · 37 g+2.8 ptSoloQ +1.0
ADCgap to expected
Zeri60.0% · expected 45.6% · 40 g+14.4 ptSoloQ +0.5
Tristana55.1% · expected 49.6% · 89 g+5.5 ptSoloQ +2.8
Ezreal60.0% · expected 52.6% · 45 g+7.4 ptSoloQ +3.3
Kalista53.3% · expected 46.8% · 45 g+6.6 ptSoloQ +2.4
Jhin55.7% · expected 51.9% · 61 g+3.9 ptSoloQ -1.0
Supportgap to expected
Lulu65.7% · expected 51.4% · 35 g+14.3 ptSoloQ -3.1
Alistar50.7% · expected 47.8% · 75 g+2.8 ptSoloQ +1.1
Leona51.9% · expected 51.1% · 108 g+0.7 ptSoloQ +0.4
Thresh52.8% · expected 48.1% · 36 g+4.7 ptSoloQ -0.6

With

Topgap to expected
Gnar60.5% · expected 48.6% · 43 g+11.9 ptSoloQ +0.7
K'Sante52.0% · expected 47.1% · 50 g+4.9 ptSoloQ -1.6
Olaf57.6% · expected 52.6% · 33 g+4.9 ptSoloQ +4.0
Dr. Mundo48.6% · expected 46.3% · 35 g+2.3 ptSoloQ -5.2
Junglegap to expected
Jarvan IV58.7% · expected 47.9% · 75 g+10.7 ptSoloQ +0.8
Viego56.3% · expected 48.5% · 32 g+7.8 ptSoloQ -0.2
Wukong54.4% · expected 52.0% · 79 g+2.5 ptSoloQ +1.8
Vi51.4% · expected 49.7% · 72 g+1.7 ptSoloQ -1.7
Midgap to expected
Sylas65.6% · expected 49.1% · 32 g+16.6 ptSoloQ -1.0
Lissandra58.8% · expected 48.0% · 34 g+10.8 ptSoloQ +2.8
Hwei60.0% · expected 50.3% · 35 g+9.7 ptSoloQ +0.6
Syndra53.2% · expected 50.7% · 62 g+2.5 ptSoloQ +0.8
Orianna50.0% · expected 47.8% · 32 g+2.2 ptSoloQ +3.1
ADCgap to expected
Caitlyn61.8% · expected 51.4% · 55 g+10.4 ptSoloQ +0.2
Ziggs52.6% · expected 45.0% · 38 g+7.7 ptSoloQ +7.1
Sivir54.7% · expected 49.1% · 53 g+5.6 ptSoloQ +3.6
Tristana56.1% · expected 49.2% · 41 g+6.8 ptSoloQ +0.2
Yunara52.5% · expected 51.6% · 61 g+0.8 ptSoloQ -1.6

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top23 champions
  • Ornn52 games
    40.4%gap -8.5 ptsSoloQ: 49.4% · 391 g
  • Ambessa41 games
    36.6%gap -12.2 ptsSoloQ: 52.1% · 585 g
  • Renekton41 games
    51.2%gap +3.5 ptsSoloQ: 55.8% · 541 g
  • Sion40 games
    45.0%gap -4.8 ptsSoloQ: 53.7% · 361 g
  • Olaf38 games
    44.7%gap -1.4 ptsSoloQ: 53.4% · 502 g
Jungle19 champions
  • Lee Sin118 games
    45.8%gap -4.0 ptsSoloQ: 53.0% · 2,454 g
  • Jarvan IV103 games
    46.6%gap -4.3 ptsSoloQ: 52.1% · 1,067 g
  • Wukong98 games
    45.9%gap -0.9 ptsSoloQ: 51.5% · 676 g
  • Vi71 games
    47.9%gap -1.2 ptsSoloQ: 51.9% · 584 g
  • Sylas51 games
    52.9%gap +4.4 ptsSoloQ: 53.9% · 930 g
Mid21 champions
  • Ahri87 games
    48.3%gap +0.6 ptsSoloQ: 52.9% · 955 g
  • Syndra65 games
    40.0%gap -8.1 ptsSoloQ: 52.2% · 1,021 g
  • Viktor54 games
    44.4%gap -4.2 ptsSoloQ: 50.5% · 946 g
  • Orianna47 games
    48.9%gap -2.1 ptsSoloQ: 49.3% · 509 g
  • Akali39 games
    53.8%gap +5.5 ptsSoloQ: 53.0% · 826 g
ADC16 champions
  • Kai'Sa119 games
    37.0%gap -13.4 ptsSoloQ: 51.9% · 2,288 g
  • Tristana89 games
    55.1%gap +5.5 ptsSoloQ: 52.8% · 2,350 g
  • Xayah76 games
    46.1%gap -2.2 ptsSoloQ: 47.0% · 861 g
  • Jhin61 games
    55.7%gap +3.9 ptsSoloQ: 50.9% · 1,596 g
  • Yunara60 games
    43.3%gap -3.9 ptsSoloQ: 47.0% · 1,116 g
Support17 champions
  • Rakan110 games
    43.6%gap -4.9 ptsSoloQ: 51.9% · 1,161 g
  • Leona108 games
    51.9%gap +0.7 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 1,274 g
  • Nautilus100 games
    46.0%gap -3.6 ptsSoloQ: 52.3% · 1,263 g
  • Rell78 games
    39.7%gap -6.1 ptsSoloQ: 51.5% · 1,609 g
  • Alistar75 games
    50.7%gap +2.8 ptsSoloQ: 50.2% · 2,055 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Support

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.1%14,676 picks of 1,322,239ban 6.8% · patches 16.20 to 16.22
  • Amateur tournaments1.6%688 picks of 42,630ban 9.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.7%16 picks of 2,252bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

14.6% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Support
  • 3.2%G1235 games of 7,322
  • 3.6%G2262 games of 7,329
  • 3.4%G3+98 games of 2,921
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 235 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.